Applications, review panels, and award reporting—funding programs with audit trails from RFP to closeout.

Award funds you can defend—applications, scoring, and financial reporting in one system

We implement eligibility rules, required attachments, and panel workflows so reviewers score consistently with conflict-of-interest checks. Awarded grants carry budgets with allowable categories—drawdowns and burn reports align to funder rules before closeout surprises. Subrecipient monitoring hooks track milestones and risk flags—pass-through programs stay compliant without email attachments.

Request Estimate
Grant Management & Funding Programs Platform Development

01 // THE MANDATE

Applications, review panels, and award reporting—funding programs with audit trails from RFP to closeout.

We implement eligibility rules, required attachments, and panel workflows so reviewers score consistently with conflict-of-interest checks. Awarded grants carry budgets with allowable categories—drawdowns and burn reports align to funder rules before closeout surprises.

Subrecipient monitoring hooks track milestones and risk flags—pass-through programs stay compliant without email attachments.

02 // ENGINEERING

Development process

Structured phases—from discovery to launch—with clear ownership and handoff points.

Policy alignment (weeks 1–6)

Funding rules, review ethics, financial chart of accounts.

MVP (weeks 6–16)

Apply, review, award, basic financials.

Pilot cycle (weeks 14–22)

One program end-to-end; auditor feedback.

Scale (weeks 20–28)

Subrecipients; integrations to GL.

Operate (ongoing)

Annual NOFO releases; training.

03 // CAPABILITIES

Core Capability Matrix

The building blocks of your solution

Programs

RFP builder; eligibility logic.

Apply

forms; budgets; collaborative editing optional.

Review

panels; blind options; score aggregation.

Awards

notices; agreements; amendments.

Financials

budget lines; draw requests; invoices optional.

Reporting

funder templates; SF-425-style exports optional.

Compliance

single audit hooks; subaward risk optional.

CRM

applicant history; communications log.

API

government portals optional.

Documents

e-sign; version control.

04 // DELIVERY LIFECYCLE

The strategic roadmap

Milestones and checkpoints—each phase has a clear outcome before the next begins.

Milestone 01Delivery

Weeks 1–6: Program configuration with program officers.

Milestone 02Delivery

Weeks 7–14: Dry-run application and review.

Milestone 03Delivery

Weeks 15–22: First funded cohort live.

Milestone 04Delivery

Weeks 23–28: Financial reporting automation.

Milestone 05Delivery

Ongoing: Funder format updates; new programs.

05 // PRODUCT SCOPING

Choosing your path

Two engagement models—start lean and iterate, or commit to a full platform build from day one.

MVP

Speed & essentialism

Phase 1
MVP: application portal, review workflow, awards, budget tracking, document vault, PDF exports. Excludes full ERP integration and federal systems of record. Proves cycle discipline before compliance depth.
Recommended

Full product

Enterprise maturity

All-in
Enterprise grants: subaward suite, ERP/GL sync, federal validation packages, multi-funder reporting, AI application triage optional.

06 // PARTNERSHIP

Why work together

A single accountable partner across strategy, build, and go-live—not a revolving door of vendors.

John Hambardzumian
Direct collaboration

End-to-end ownership: discovery, architecture, implementation, and launch—with clear communication and production-grade engineering.

  • Discovery & alignment
  • Systems that scale
  • Implementation depth
  • Clear comms

07 // CLARITY

Frequently asked

We map controls your grants office defines—software supports evidence collection.

Ready to start?

Tell me about your product goals and timeline—I'll respond with a clear path forward.